skip to navigation
skip to content

Nuitka 0.5.20

Python compiler with full language support and CPython compatibility

Nuitka User Manual

.. image:: images/Nuitka-Logo-Symbol.png

.. raw:: pdf

PageBreak oneColumn
SetPageCounter 1


This document is the recommended first read if you are interested in using
Nuitka, understand its use cases, check what you can expect, license,
requirements, credits, etc.

Nuitka is **the** Python compiler. It is a seamless replacement or extension
to the Python interpreter and compiles **every** construct that CPython 2.6,
2.7, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, and 3.5 have. It then executed uncompiled code, and compiled
code together in an extremely compatible manner.

You can use all Python library modules or and all extension modules freely. It
translates the Python into a C level program that then uses "libpython" to
execute in the same way as CPython does. All optimization is aimed at avoiding
overhead, where it's unnecessary. None is aimed at removing compatibility,
although there is an "improved" mode, where not every bug of standard Python
is emulated, e.g. more complete error messages are given.



- C++ Compiler: You need a compiler with support for C++03 [#]_

Currently this means, you need to use either of these compilers:

* GNU g++ compiler of at least version 4.4

* The clang compiler on MacOS X or FreeBSD, based on LLVM version 3.2
or higher.

* The MinGW64 [#]_ compiler on Windows.

* Visual Studio 2015 or higher on Windows [#]_

- Python: Version 2.6, 2.7 or 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5 (yes, but read below)

.. admonition:: Python3, yes but Python2 *compile time* dependency

For Python3 you *need* a Python2, but only during the compile time
only, and that is for Scons (which orchestrates the C++ compilation), and
is not yet ported. So for Python 3.x, there is currently a requirement to
also have a Python 2.x installed.

Nuitka itself is fully Python3 compatible except for Scons.

.. admonition:: Moving to other machines

The created binaries can be made executable independent of the Python
installation, with ``--standalone`` option.

.. admonition:: Binary filename suffix ".exe" even on Linux

The created binaries have an ".exe" suffix, that you are free to remove
that and yes, they are still Linux binaries. The suffix is just to be sure
that the original script name and the binary name do not collide.

.. admonition:: It has to be CPython, maybe WinPython or AnaConda

You need the standard Python implementation, called "CPython", to execute
Nuitka, because it is closely tied to using it.

On Windows, the so called "WinPython" and "AnaConda" distributions work,
but will cause issues for acceleration mode. Standalone mode and creating
extension modules or packages will work. For acceleration mode, you need
to copy the "PythonXX.DLL" alongside of it.

- Operating System: Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, MacOS X, and Windows (32/64 bits).

Others may work as well. The portability is expected to be generally good, but
the e.g. Scons usage may have to be adapted.

- Architectures: x86, x86_64 (amd64), and arm, likely more

Other architectures are expected to also work, out of the box, as Nuitka is
generally not using any hardware specifics. These are just the ones tested
and known to be good. Feedback is welcome. Generally the architectures that
Debian supports can be considered good and tested too.

.. [#] Support for this C++03 language standard is practically a given on any
C++ compiler you encounter. Nuitka used to have higher requirements in
the past, but it changed.

.. [#] Download MinGW64 from here and choose 64 or 32
bits matching your Python. Use both MinGW64 and 64 bits Python if you
have the choice of which Python to use. Install it to "C:\MinGW64" or
"\MinGW64" (same disk root) to find it automatically.

.. [#] Download for free from
(the Express editions will normally work just fine).

Command Line

No environment variable changes are needed, most noteworthy, you do not have to
mess with ``PYTHONPATH`` at all for Nuitka. You just execute the ``nuitka`` and
``nuitka-run`` scripts directly without any changes to the environment. You may
want to add the ``bin`` directory to your ``PATH`` for your convenience, but
that step is optional.

Nuitka has a ``--help`` option to output what it can do:

.. code-block:: bash

nuitka --help

The ``nuitka-run`` command is the same as ``nuitka``, but with different
default. It tries to compile *and* directly execute a Python script:

.. code-block:: bash

nuitka-run --help

These option that is different is ``--run``, and passing on arguments after the
first non-option to the created binary, so it is somewhat more similar to what
plain ``python`` will do.


Nuitka is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0; you may not use
it except in compliance with the License.

You may obtain a copy of the License at

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed
under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR
CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License.

Use Cases

Use Case 1 - Program compilation with all modules embedded

If you want to compile a whole program recursively, and not only the single file
that is the main program, do it like this:

.. code-block:: bash

nuitka --recurse-all

.. note::

There are more fine grained controls than ``--recurse-all`` available.
Consider the output of ``nuitka --help``.

In case you have a plugin directory, i.e. one which cannot be found by recursing
after normal import statements via the ``PYTHONPATH`` (which would be
recommended way), you can always require that a given directory shall also be
included in the executable:

.. code-block:: bash

nuitka --recurse-all --recurse-directory=plugin_dir

.. note::

If you don't do any dynamic imports, simply setting your ``PYTHONPATH`` at
compilation time will be sufficient for all your needs normally.

Use ``--recurse-directory`` only if you make ``__import__()`` calls that
Nuitka cannot predict, because they e.g. depend on command line
parameters. Nuitka also warns about these, and point to the option.

.. note::

The resulting binary still depends on CPython and used C extension modules
being installed.

If you want to be able to copy it to another machine, use ``--standalone``
and copy the created ``program.dist`` directory and execute the
``program.exe`` put inside.

.. note::

The resulting filename will be ``program.exe`` on all platforms, that
doesn't mean it doesn't run on non-Windows! But if you compile ``program``
we wouldn't want to overwrite it, or be unsure which one is the compiled
form, and which one is not.

Use Case 2 - Extension Module compilation

If you want to compile a single extension module, all you have to do is this:

.. code-block:: bash

nuitka --module

The resulting file "" can then be used instead of
"". It's left as an exercise to the reader, what happens if both
are present.

.. note::

The option ``--recurse-all`` and other variants work as well.

Use Case 3 - Package compilation

If you need to compile a whole package and embedded all modules, that is also
feasible, use Nuitka like this:

.. code-block:: bash

nuitka --module some_package --recurse-directory=some_package

.. note::

The recursion into the package directory needs to be provided manually,
otherwise the package is empty. Data files located inside the package will
not be embedded yet.

Where to go next

Remember, this project is not completed yet. Although the CPython test suite
works near perfect, there is still more work needed, to make it do more
optimization. Try it out.

Subscribe to its mailing lists

Please visit the `mailing list page
<http:"" pages="" mailinglist.html="">`__ in order to subscribe the
relatively low volume mailing list. All Nuitka issues can be discussed there.
Also this is the place to stay informed of what's coming.

Report issues or bugs

Should you encounter any issues, bugs, or ideas, please visit the `Nuitka bug
tracker <http:"">`__ and report them.

Best practices for reporting bugs:

- Please aways include the following information in your report, for the
underlying Python version. You can easily copy&paste this into your

.. code-block:: sh

nuitka --version

- Try to make your example minimal. That is, try to remove code that does
not contribute to the issue as much as possible. Ideally come up with
a small reproducing program that illustrates the issue, using ``print``
with different results when that programs runs compiled or native.

- If the problem occurs spuriously (i.e. not each time), try to set the
environment variable ``PYTHONHASHSEED`` to ``0``, disabling hash
randomization. If that makes the problem go away, try increasing in
steps of 1 to a hash seed value that makes it happen every time.

- Do not include the created code in your report. Given proper input,
it's redundant, and it's not likely that I will look at it without
the ability to change the Python or Nuitka source and re-run it.

Contact me via email with your questions

The best place to ask questions is the mailing list. You are welcome to
`contact me via email <>`__ with your questions. But
it is increasingly true that for user questions the mailing list is the best
place to go. Often somebody there knows more about what you are doing.

Follow me on Twitter

Nuitka announcements and interesting stuff is pointed to on the Twitter account,
but obviously with no details. `@KayHayen <https:"" kayhayen="">`_.

Word of Warning

Consider using this software with caution. Even though many tests are applied
before releases, things are potentially breaking. Your feedback and patches to
Nuitka are very welcome.

Especially report it please, if you find that anything doesn't work, because the
project is now at the stage that this should not happen and most definitely will
mean you encountered an unknown bug.

Join Nuitka

You are more than welcome to join Nuitka development and help to complete the
project in all minor and major ways.

The development of Nuitka occurs in git. We currently have these 3 branches:

- `master
<http:"" gitweb="" ?p="Nuitka.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master">`__:

This branch contains the stable release to which only hotfixes for bugs will
be done. It is supposed to work at all times and is supported.

- `develop
<http:"" gitweb="" ?p="Nuitka.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/develop">`__:

This branch contains the ongoing development. It may at times contain little
regressions, but also new features. On this branch the integration work is
done, whereas new features might be developed on feature branches.

- `factory
<http:"" gitweb="" ?p="Nuitka.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/factory">`__:

This branch contains unfinished and incomplete work. It is very frequently
subject ``git rebase`` and the public staging ground, where my work
for develop branch lives first. It is intended for testing only and
recommended to base any of your own development on. When updating it,
you very often will get merge conflicts. Simply resolve those by doing
``git reset --hard origin/factory`` and switch to the latest version.

.. note::

I accept patch files, git formatted patch queues (use ``git format-patch
origin`` command), or if you prefer git pull on the social code platforms.

I will do the integration work. If you base your work on "master" or
"develop" at any given time, I will do any re-basing required and keep your
authorship intact.

.. note::

The `Developer Manual <http:"" doc="" developer-manual.html="">`__
explains the coding rules, branching model used, with feature branches and
hotfix releases, the Nuitka design and much more. Consider reading it to
become a contributor. This document is intended for Nuitka users.


Should you feel that you cannot help Nuitka directly, but still want to support,
please consider `making a donation <http:"" pages="" donations.html="">`__
and help this way.

Unsupported functionality

The ``co_code`` attribute of code objects

The code objects are empty for for native compiled functions. There is no
bytecode with Nuitka's compiled function objects, so there is no way to provide


Constant Folding

The most important form of optimization is the constant folding. This is when an
operation can be fully predicted at compile time. Currently Nuitka does these
for some built-ins (but not all yet, somebody to look at this more closely will
be very welcome!), and it does it e.g. for binary/unary operations and

Constants currently recognized:

.. code-block:: python

5 + 6 # binary operations
not 7 # unary operations
5 < 6 # comparisons
range(3) # built-ins

Literals are the one obvious source of constants, but also most likely other
optimization steps like constant propagation or function inlining will be. So
this one should not be underestimated and a very important step of successful
optimizations. Every option to produce a constant may impact the generated code
quality a lot.

.. admonition:: Status

The folding of constants is considered implemented, but it might be
incomplete in that not all possible cases are caught. Please report it as a
bug when you find an operation in Nuitka that has only constants as input
and is not folded.

Constant Propagation

At the core of optimizations there is an attempt to determine values of
variables at run time and predictions of assignments. It determines if their
inputs are constants or of similar values. An expression, e.g. a module variable
access, an expensive operation, may be constant across the module of the
function scope and then there needs to be none, or no repeated module variable

Consider e.g. the module attribute ``__name__`` which likely is only ever read,
so its value could be predicted to a constant string known at compile time. This
can then be used as input to the constant folding.

.. code-block:: python

if __name__ == "__main__":
# Your test code might be here

.. admonition:: Status

From modules attributes, only ``__name__`` are currently actually optimized.
Also possible would be at least ``__doc__``. In the future, this may improve
as SSA is expanded to module variables.

Built-in Name Lookups

Also built-in exception name references are optimized if they are used as module
level read only variables:

.. code-block:: python

except ValueError: # The ValueError is a slow global name lookup normally.

.. admonition:: Status

This works for all built-in names. When an assignment is done to such a
name, or it's even local, then of course it is not done.

Built-in Call Prediction

For built-in calls like ``type``, ``len``, or ``range`` it is often possible to
predict the result at compile time, esp. for constant inputs the resulting value
often can be precomputed by Nuitka. It can simply determine the result or the
raised exception and replace the built-in call with that value, allowing for
more constant folding or code path reduction.

.. code-block:: python

type("string") # predictable result, builtin type str.
len([1, 2]) # predictable result
range(3, 9, 2) # predictable result
range(3, 9, 0) # predictable exception, range raises due to 0.

.. admonition:: Status

The built-in call prediction is considered implemented. We can simply during
compile time emulate the call and use its result or raised exception. But we
may not cover all the built-ins there are yet.

Sometimes the result of a built-in should not be predicted when the result is
big. A ``range()`` call e.g. may give too big values to include the result in
the binary. Then it is not done.

.. code-block:: python

range( 100000 ) # We do not want this one to be expanded

.. admonition:: Status

This is considered mostly implemented. Please file bugs for built-ins that
are pre-computed, but should not be computed by Nuitka at compile time with
specific values.

Conditional Statement Prediction

For conditional statements, some branches may not ever be taken, because of the
conditions being possible to predict. In these cases, the branch not taken and
the condition check is removed.

This can typically predict code like this:

.. code-block:: python

if __name__ == "__main__":
# Your test code might be here


.. code-block:: python

if False:
# Your deactivated code might be here

It will also benefit from constant propagations, or enable them because once
some branches have been removed, other things may become more predictable, so
this can trigger other optimization to become possible.

Every branch removed makes optimization more likely. With some code branches
removed, access patterns may be more friendly. Imagine e.g. that a function is
only called in a removed branch. It may be possible to remove it entirely, and
that may have other consequences too.

.. admonition:: Status

This is considered implemented, but for the maximum benefit, more constants
need to be determined at compile time.

Exception Propagation

For exceptions that are determined at compile time, there is an expression that
will simply do raise the exception. These can be propagated upwards, collecting
potentially "side effects", i.e. parts of expressions that were executed before
it occurred, and still have to be executed.

Consider the following code:

.. code-block:: python

print side_effect_having() + (1 / 0)
print something_else()

The ``(1 / 0)`` can be predicted to raise a ``ZeroDivisionError`` exception,
which will be propagated through the ``+`` operation. That part is just Constant
Propagation as normal.

The call `side_effect_having()`` will have to be retained though, but the
``print`` statement does not and can be turned into an explicit raise. The
statement sequence can then be aborted and as such the ``something_else`` call
needs no code generation or consideration anymore.

To that end, Nuitka works with a special node that raises an exception and is
wrapped with a so called "side_effects" expression, but yet can be used in code
as an expression having a value.

.. admonition:: Status

The propagation of exceptions is mostly implemented, but needs handling in
every kind of operations, and not all of them might do it already. As work
progresses or examples arise, the coverage will be extended. Feel free to
generate bug reports with non-working examples.

Exception Scope Reduction

Consider the following code:

.. code-block:: python

b = 8
print range(3, b, 0)
print "Will not be executed"
except ValueError, e:
print e

The ``try`` block is bigger than it needs to be. The statement ``b = 8`` cannot
cause a ``ValueError`` to be raised. As such it can be moved to outside the try
without any risk.

.. code-block:: python

b = 8
print range(3, b, 0)
print "Will not be executed"
except ValueError as e:
print e

.. admonition:: Status

This is considered done. For every kind of operation, we trace if it may
raise an exception. We do however *not* track properly yes, what can do
a ``ValueError`` and what cannot.

Exception Block Inlining

With the exception propagation it is then becomes possible to transform this

.. code-block:: python

b = 8
print range(3, b, 0)
print "Will not be executed"
except ValueError, e:
print e

.. code-block:: python

raise ValueError, "range() step argument must not be zero"
except ValueError, e:
print e

Which then can be reduced by avoiding the raise and catch of the exception,
making it:

.. code-block:: python

e = ValueError( "range() step argument must not be zero" )
print e

.. admonition:: Status

This is not implemented yet.

Empty Branch Removal

For loops and conditional statements that contain only code without effect, it
should be possible to remove the whole construct:

.. code-block:: python

for i in range(1000):

The loop could be removed, at maximum it should be considered an assignment of
variable ``i`` to ``999`` and no more.

.. admonition:: Status

This is not implemented yet, as it requires us to track iterators, and their
side effects, as well as loop values, and exit conditions. Too much yet, but
we will get there.

Another example:

.. code-block:: python

if side_effect_free:

The condition check should be removed in this case, as its evaluation is not
needed. It may be difficult to predict that ``side_effect_free`` has no side
effects, but many times this might be possible.

.. admonition:: Status

This is considered implemented. The conditional statement nature is removed
if both branches are empty, only the condition is evaluated, and checked for
truth (in cases that could raise an exception).

Unpacking Prediction

When the length of the right hand side of an assignment to a sequence can be
predicted, the unpacking can be replaced with multiple assignments.

.. code-block:: python

a, b, c = 1, side_effect_free(), 3

.. code-block:: python

a = 1
b = side_effect_free()
c = 3

This is of course only really safe if the left hand side cannot raise an
exception while building the assignment targets.

We do this now, but only for constants, because we currently have no ability to
predict if an expression can raise an exception or not.

.. admonition:: Status

Not implemented yet. Will need us to see through the unpacking of what is
an iteration over a tuple, we created ourselves. We are not there yet, but
we will get there.

Built-in Type Inference

When a construct like ``in xrange()`` or ``in range()`` is used, it is possible
to know what the iteration does and represent that, so that iterator users can
use that instead.

I consider that:

.. code-block:: python

for i in xrange(1000):

could translate ``xrange(1000)`` into an object of a special class that does the
integer looping more efficiently. In case ``i`` is only assigned from there,
this could be a nice case for a dedicated class.

.. admonition:: Status

Future work, not even started.

Quicker Function Calls

Functions are structured so that their parameter parsing and ``tp_call``
interface is separate from the actual function code. This way the call can be
optimized away. One problem is that the evaluation order can differ.

.. code-block:: python

def f(a, b, c):
return a, b, c

f(c = get1(), b = get2(), a = get3())

This will have to evaluate first ``get1()``, then ``get2()`` and only then
``get3()`` and then make the function call with these values.

Therefore it will be necessary to have a staging of the parameters before making
the actual call, to avoid an re-ordering of the calls to ``get1()``, ``get2()``,
and ``get3()``.

.. admonition:: Status

Not even started. A re-formulation that avoids the dictionary to call the
function, and instead uses temporary variables appears to be relatively
straight forward once we do that kind of parameter analysis.

Lowering of iterated Container Types

In some cases, accesses to ``list`` constants can become ``tuple`` constants

Consider that:

.. code-block:: python

for x in [a, b, c]:

Can be optimized into this:

.. code-block:: python

for x in (a, b, c):

This allows for simpler, faster code to be generated, and less checks needed,
because e.g. the ``tuple`` is clearly immutable, whereas the ``list`` needs a
check to assert that. This is also possible for sets.

.. admonition:: Status

Implemented, even works for non-constants. Needs other optimization to
become generally useful, and will itself help other optimization to become
possible. This allows us to e.g. only treat iteration over tuples, and not
care about sets.

In theory something similar is also possible for ``dict``. For the later it will
be non-trivial though to maintain the order of execution without temporary
values introduced. The same thing is done for pure constants of these types,
they change to ``tuple`` values when iterated.


Contributors to Nuitka

Thanks go to these individuals for their much valued contributions to
Nuitka. Contributors have the license to use Nuitka for their own code even if
Closed Source.

The order is sorted by time.

- Li Xuan Ji: Contributed patches for general portability issue and enhancements
to the environment variable settings.

- Nicolas Dumazet: Found and fixed reference counting issues, ``import``
packages work, improved some of the English and generally made good code
contributions all over the place, solved code generation TODOs, did tree
building cleanups, core stuff.

- Khalid Abu Bakr: Submitted patches for his work to support MinGW and Windows,
debugged the issues, and helped me to get cross compile with MinGW from Linux
to Windows. This was quite a difficult stuff.

- Liu Zhenhai: Submitted patches for Windows support, making the inline Scons
copy actually work on Windows as well. Also reported import related bugs, and
generally helped me make the Windows port more usable through his testing and

- Christopher Tott: Submitted patches for Windows, and general as well as
structural cleanups.

- Pete Hunt: Submitted patches for MacOS X support.

- "ownssh": Submitted patches for built-ins module guarding, and made massive
efforts to make high quality bug reports. Also the initial "standalone" mode
implementation was created by him.

- Juan Carlos Paco: Submitted cleanup patches, creator of the `Nuitka GUI
<https:"" juancarlospaco="" nuitka-gui="">`__, creator of the `Ninja IDE
plugin <https:"" juancarlospaco="" nuitka-ninja="">`__ for Nuitka.

- "dr. Equivalent": Submitted the Nuitka Logo.

- Johan Holmberg: Submitted patch for Python3 support on MacOS X.

- Umbra: Submitted patches to make the Windows port more usable, adding user
provided application icons, as well as MSVC support for large constants and
console applications.

- David Cortesi: Submitted patches and test cases to make MacOS port more
usable, specifically for the Python3 standalone support of Qt.

Projects used by Nuitka

* The `CPython project <http:"">`__

Thanks for giving us CPython, which is the base of Nuitka. We are nothing
without it.

* The `GCC project <http:"">`__

Thanks for not only the best compiler suite, but also thanks for supporting
C++11 which helped to get Nuitka off the ground. Your compiler was the first
usable for Nuitka and with little effort.

* The `Scons project <http:"">`__

Thanks for tackling the difficult points and providing a Python environment to
make the build results. This is such a perfect fit to Nuitka and a dependency
that will likely remain.

* The `valgrind project <http:"">`__

Luckily we can use Valgrind to determine if something is an actual improvement
without the noise. And it's also helpful to determine what's actually
happening when comparing.

* The `NeuroDebian project <http:"">`__

Thanks for hosting the build infrastructure that the Debian and sponsor
Yaroslav Halchenko uses to provide packages for all Ubuntu versions.

* The `openSUSE Buildservice <http:"">`__

Thanks for hosting this excellent service that allows us to provide RPMs for a
large variety of platforms and make them available immediately nearly at
release time.

* The `MinGW64 project <http:"">`__

Thanks for porting the gcc to Windows. This allowed portability of Nuitka with
relatively little effort.

* The `Buildbot project <http:"">`__

Thanks for creating an easy to deploy and use continuous integration framework
that also runs on Windows and is written and configured in Python code. This
allows to run the Nuitka tests long before release time.

Updates for this Manual

This document is written in REST. That is an ASCII format which is readable as
ASCII, but used to generate PDF or HTML documents.

You will find the current source under:;a=blob_plain;f=README.rst

And the current PDF under:
File Type Py Version Uploaded on Size
Nuitka-0.5.20.tar.gz (md5) Source 2016-03-20 1MB
  • Downloads (All Versions):
  • 0 downloads in the last day
  • 0 downloads in the last week
  • 2044 downloads in the last month